Every tool in this category sorts by follower count and then argues about whether that is a good idea. This is the argument settled with arithmetic, from real briefs, updated as more of them run.
Not published yet. 0 of the 25 runs needed are in, and a study built on fewer would be noise with a headline on it. It appears here on its own once there is enough behind it.
We could publish something today. A percentage from a handful of briefs would look exactly like a real finding and would be worth nothing, and the entire argument of this product is that we do not do that. 25 runs is the floor.
Computed from briefs people ran through this tool, which is not a random sample of creator marketing: the briefs that arrive here are ones somebody already suspected follower count would answer badly. It describes what happened in these runs and does not claim to describe the industry. Every figure states how many runs it rests on.